This is a form published by BCDC at the RAPC meeting on June 3. Fill it out and send it to me. I'll forward it to them.For now, just use the number system they define. Contact Neuwirth directly if you have any questions. I've just made their stuff into a web page.

This is a tool to understand the impacts of various proposed airfield developments on San Francisco Bay. The development scenarios described below are the sets of runway proposals currently being modeled for their ability to safely meet the region’s projected flight demand through 2020. Most of these runway alternatives require Bay fill. Although the detailed environmental assessment of these proposals is just beginning, this scorecard is a simple method of judging the impacts of individual runway proposals and their cumulative effects. As projects are refined and environmental documents are made public, this scorecard can be completed by scaling the duration and extent of impacts on Bay resources. The matrix proposes a 1 to 4 ranking scheme. The table lists the resources vertically and the scenarios horizontally. These resources are the considerations required by the law governing BCDC. We hope it provides a useful perspective. Please let us know how we can help you understand these important issues. Thank you.

This alternative assumes no additional runways at San Francisco International Airport (SFO) or Metropolitan Oakland International Airport (OAK). At San Jose International Airport (SJC), it considers two 11,000 ft. air carrier runways with 700 feet of separation as described in their Master Plan. This is their level of development for all scenarios. No Bay fill is contemplated at SJC.

This scenario analyzes the Refined BX Alternative at SFO and no new runways at OAK. Refined BX would construct a new 9,000 ft. runway 4,300 feet northeast of existing Runway 10L/28R to allow two aircraft to land simultaneously during inclement weather conditions, and would convert existing Runway 28L for use predominantly as a taxiway. This proposal would also extend existing Runway 1R/19L 7,500 ft. to the northeast, convert runway 1L/19R to use as a taxiway, and construct a new 9,000 ft. Runway 1R 3,400 feet to the southeast of extended Runway 1R/19L. Other minor runway modifications and additional facilities are also contemplated. Depending on the construction technique, the surface area of bay fill is estimated to be between 730 and 1,222 acres.

This alternative proposes new runways at both SFO and OAK. The runway at OAK would be inboard of the current runways but would not require Bay fill. At SFO, Alternative 3A would be analyzed. This would construct a new 11,500 ft. runway 4,300 feet northeast of the existing Runway 28R to permit two aircraft to land simultaneously during inclement weather conditions and would convert existing Runway 28L/10R predominantly to a taxiway. Other runway improvements and supporting facilities would also be constructed. The estimated Bay fill of the new runway is between 403 and 605 acres depending on construction techniques.

Scenario 6a analyzes SFO’s alternative Refined BX with OAK’s B3 as described above.